How democratic institutions actually work—and for whom. We investigate Supreme Court doctrine, voting rights litigation, municipal rebellion, participatory budgeting, judicial activism, executive immunity, and the administrative state. From Chevron deference to bilingual governance, legal architecture shapes daily life.
55 articles

When Utilities Choose Governors
How physical systems—pipelines, grids, cables—shape political realities in American cities and define the geography of governance.

The Language Penalty: Speaking Spanish Costs Power
How to run elections, permits, and emergencies in two languages—and why it makes a republic smarter. Every morning, millions of Americans begin their day in Spanish and end it in English (or vice versa). The republic is bilingual in fact, yet too many of our most consequential interactions with.

The Profit-Price Channel: How Market Power Turns Shocks into Inflation
Between what we pay and what it cost to make runs a corridor of hidden doors—contracts, fees, platforms, habits—where a quiet arithmetic decides how much of a shock becomes a price and how much becomes a profit. The profit-price channel, mapped with equations and evidence.

The Activist Card: Judicial Hypocrisy
Conservative judging since the 1980s—and the paradox of a movement that won by denouncing its own reflection. The term 'judicial activism' is the judiciary's favorite insult and our public square's dullest knife. Everyone uses it to describe the decisions they don't like; few define it before.

Fear, Trump, and the Edit: When One Splice Weaponizes an Entire Newsroom
A miscut speech, a $5 billion threat, and two resignations: how the BBC crisis reveals the asymmetric warfare against independent media. When power hunts for seams in newsroom armor, every error becomes a hostage situation—and even UK Labour ministers declare the BBC must change.

The Activists Who Said They Weren't
How a conservative legal movement rewrote American law from the 1980s to today. For forty years, the conservative legal movement has sold a deceptively simple ethic: judges should interpret, not make, the law. The method was restraint; the result was revolution.

The Archive: Spanish Records Prove Native Claims
Building the bilingual memory infrastructure the United States forgot it needed. A country that cannot search its past will mis-govern its future. Ours keeps half its memory in another language—acequia minutes, merced deeds, mission ledgers, notarial protocols, diseños, parish censuses—a.

Teaching Heat: How to Run a Classroom Where Disagreement Is the Point
Disagreement is not a failure of learning but its engine. This essay offers a complete protocol for teaching contested material without quotas or theater—steps that make argument safe, evidence visible, and change measurable.

The Debate-Stopper: How Labels Kill Conversation
Labels can act like trapdoors—say a word and the floor drops. This essay explains how debate-stoppers work psychologically, rhetorically, and institutionally, then offers tools to disarm them in classrooms, newsrooms, and public forums.

The Client Is the People: On Lawyers Who Mistake a President for a Republic
In the labyrinth of American law, the first wrong turn is often grammatical. Swap a singular for a plural—the President for the People—and a whole architecture shifts by degrees until courthouses feel like vestibules to a single man's will. What opens as error hardens into habit; what begins as.
